Jesus Statue - News Article
Jesus of Nazareth is someone who is
honored throughout in the world this time of year, among scholars,
historians, archaeologists, even Muslims, Hindus, and some Jewish
people who don't necessarily “believe in” him. His existence is
indisputable, even by Dan Brown. So, one might ask, “What is so
'religious' about a statue of this man of history on public
property?” Is it because some fanatically believe in him while
others barely acknowledge him? If it does violate The Establishment
Clause, as some purport, what “religious law” is being
established by Congress through the display of a historical figure?
What about the memory of this man needs
so desperately to be erased, to even oppose private people seeking a
land swap to protect it? If some choose to honor him for his good
works and gracious teachings, why do others feel the need to forbid
this and iconoclast his monuments? Would we so easily tear down
statues of Abraham Lincoln, Mother Theresa, or Martin Luther King as
historical figures because not everyone agrees with their ideologies?
Such zeal shows insouciance to the message behind “Fahrenheit
451”.
The same might be asked about those who
so vehemently oppose displaying a nativity scene. Did the birth of
Jesus never happen? How would you like all your baby pictures burned
and birth records destroyed by the government because some people
wanted to honor you, but someone else thought it was too audacious to
have them displayed or even remembered? Hear his own words, “...for
which of these works are you going to stone me?”
Make no mistake – the spirit that
plotted against Jesus is still harbored by some today. We see
history repeating itself, but not with physical nails and wood. It
is through ideology, financial barring, petitioning, lobbying, and
philosophical bullying. It is the Ebeneezer-esque, Anti-Christmas
spirit. To tear down a statue or scene is symbolically tearing down
what it represents – a living person, his or her ideas, and their
ambition, just like Hussein's was torn down for his. The Nazarene
represents something more fundamental to human existence – virtue
and honor and love. People honor what they want to emulate. I'm
sure FFRF has its own “sacred cows” – C. Darwin, C. Sagan, R.
Dawkins, D. Hume. The Pharisees of Jesus' day despised him while He
went about doing good. No less for those who want to “be free
from” his teachings and ideas today. But just out of curiosity,
which of this man's actions or teachings does the FFRF so
passionately want to be “free from”?
Is it, “Do unto others as you would
have them do unto you”? Or maybe, “Care about your neighbor in
the same way you care about yourself.“ Or was it that he “went
about doing good”? Who wouldn't want to have their society live up
to such notions or honor such ideology? Especially in such a time as
this.
Ideas he taught (and walked-out) like
trusting, hoping, caring are so foundational, no one can be any more
“free” from them than they can be “free” from breathing air.
They may again make a martyr of him. And he might just rise again.
Irregardless of a statue, His ideas will live on. Let them
disseminate this season. May the Spirit of Christmas be poured out
on every heart – of spiritual FREEDOM and expression, hope and
forgiveness, caring and giving. Happy Holy-days!
As long as Christians visit or work
there, Jesus will ALWAYS be on the Mountain - and they can't "vote
Him off".
Comments
Post a Comment